Public Support

Hi,

thanks for the fast response!

1) Alright, understood. So the assumption that the automatically created sample stream will be named filter.pin didn't seem save for us, although it should not be feasible to two sample streams from one pin of one filter ins the graph. But thanks for that hint!
2) Perfect, looking forward to it!
3) Yes, the Configration Editor was used to observe the results of the commands and might have been open in parallel from time to time. That might have been the reason. But let me mention, that the feedback from the adtf_config_tool is unsufficient here and there (e.g. when there's typo and nothing happens).

BR
Robin

Hi Robin,

1) Alright, understood. So the assumption that the automatically created sample stream will be named filter.pin didn't seem save for us

OK, but that is the automatism, it will have the name if you do a pin-2-pin connection, in CE as in CLI.
This is important for the Sample Stream Trace View for example, then you get easily the relation to the source name and pin.
Of course you can still add sample streams manually and give them unique names.

[...], although it should not be feasible to two sample streams from one pin of one filter ins the graph. But thanks for that hint!

Again, it is not valid that a pin can have more connection, no matter which direction.
So having a pin to 2 sample streams is not valid (except one connection is deactivated, but that makes no sense in your setup).

3) Yes, the Configration Editor was used to observe the results of the commands and might have been open in parallel from time to time.

That is what comes to my mind because then you have two clients who wants write access.

But let me mention, that the feedback from the adtf_config_tool is unsufficient here and there (e.g. when there's typo and nothing happens).

Can you give a concrete example / call where you miss feedback ?
Because this should work of course, maybe there is some uncaught exception...

For example if I try connect unexisting filters:

adtf_config_tool.exe --session demo_data_and_time_triggered_filter.adtfsession --execute connect bla bli
Result code '-20 '(ERR_NOT_FOUND) - no item with name 'bla' found [adtf_config_tool.cpp:105(find_model)]

Regards,
Florian

Hi Florian,

an example for missing feedback using the hello_world example attached:

adtf_config_tool.exe --session default_session.adtfsession -e addcomponent sub_graph/graphs/live samplestream default_sample_stream.streaming.adtf.cid ss
adtf_config_tool.exe --session default_session.adtfsession -e connect sub_graph/graphs/live/filters/sender sub_graph/graphs/live/sample_streams/ss --output-pin bli --input-pin bla

The output and input pins bli and bla do not exist, but there is no feedback from this command.

BR,
Robin

Alright. No further support needed. Thanks!

BR

Robin